Pharmacologic and intermittent pneumatic compression thromboembolic prophylaxis in 563 consecutives abdominoplasty cases

Background: Abdominoplasty is a common cosmetic surgery and is subject to the same complications as any surgical procedure, including thromboembolic phenomena. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of complications in consecutive abdominoplasties performed over a 3-year period, to identify risk factors for the complications, and to compare the efficacy of two protocols for prevention of thromboembolism. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of 563 patients who underwent isolated abdominoplasty or abdominoplasty combined with additional cosmetic surgeries between March 2008 and April 2011. All patients received thromboembolism prophylaxis using either pharmacological (enoxaparin; 357 patients) or mechanical (intermittent pneumatic compression, IPC; 206 patients) protocols. Results: Of the 563 patients studied, 4 (0.7%) were male (0.7%) and 559 (99.3%) were female. The patients underwent isolated abdominoplasty (201; 35.7%) or abdominoplasty combined with other procedures (362; 64.3%). The patient groups receiving pharmacological and mechanical prophylaxis presented similar demographic and clinical characteristics and had similar risk factors for thromboembolic events. The incidence of complications in the patient groups undergoing pharmacological versus mechanical prophylaxis were: hematoma (5.6% vs. 10.7%), infection (2.2% vs. 2.4%), dehiscence (3.1% vs. 1.9%), seroma (2.2% vs. 2.4%), and deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (0.6% vs. 0.5%). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications between the two groups. Conclusion: The incidence of complications in 563 consecutive cases of abdominoplasty was similar to that reported in the literature. The pharmacological and mechanical protocols for thromboembolic prophylaxis in abdominoplasty were equally effective.